Profile
Statistics

Taha Sochi

Bio

I did several A-level, GNVQ and NVQ courses in London colleges. I hold an HND in electronics engineering from London Electronics College, a diploma in mathematics from Open University, a BEng in electronics engineering from Middlesex University, a BSc in physics from Open University, a PhD in petroleum engineering from Imperial College London, a PhD in Crystallography from Birkbeck College London, and a PhD in atomic and molecular physics with astronomy from University College London. I worked between 21/02/ 2011 and 31/03/2014 as research associate in computational modeling and image processing (Modeling blood flow in large coronary vessels and network extraction form vascular images) at the Department of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering King’s College London.

Research Fields

Condensed Matter Physics

Editorial Board Memberships

Taha is not currently contributing as an editor for any journal or publisher.

Editor Records (manuscripts handled as editor)
Has reviewed for

Showing 6 of 47  

Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

145

Reviews (last 12 months)

9

Reviews (average per year)

38

Merit

401

Openness

2.8%


Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Taha Sochi has reviewed for.

Taha Sochi

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Taha Sochi's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Taha Sochi each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.