Profile
Statistics

Michiru Nagatsu

Bio

Here' my favorite prose on refereeing called "I'm The Referee" by David J. Pannell (2002)

You've posted in your paper/ To a journal of repute/ And you're hoping that the referees/ Won't send you down the chute

You'd better not build up a sense of/ False security/ I've just received your manuscript and/ I'm the referee

This power's a revelation/ I'm so glad it's come to me/ I can be a total bastard with/ Complete impunity

I used to be a psychopath/ But never more will be/ I can deal with my frustrations now that/ I'm a referee

D. J. Pannell. Prose, psychopaths and persistence: Personal perspectives on publishing. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie, 50(2):101–115, 2002.

Editorial Board Memberships
Current Memberships
Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

42

Reviews (last 12 months)

8

Reviews (average per year)

4

Merit

120

Openness

17.9%

Review to Publication ratio

42:1


Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Michiru Nagatsu has reviewed for.

Michiru Nagatsu

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Michiru Nagatsu's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Michiru Nagatsu each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.