Profile
Statistics

Matthew T. Sutherland

Bio

Dr. Sutherland’s research focuses on understanding the impact of drug abuse on human brain function. With emphasis on cigarette smoking, cannabis use, and HIV infection his research employs multiple neuroimaging tools (e.g., pharmacological, task-based and “resting-state” functional magnetic resonance imaging). Dr. Sutherland has a broad background in cognitive neuroscience and specific training in drug abuse. He earned his B.A. in Psychology from Ohio University (2002) and his Ph.D. in Psychology/Cognitive Neuroscience from the University of New Mexico (2007). He earned an Intramural Research Training Award to conduct postdoctoral research involving a cognitive neuroscience perspective on drug abuse in the Neuroimaging Research Branch at the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA/NIH). He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department of Psychology at FIU. His research is currently funded by NIDA.

Research Fields

Central Nervous System

Editorial Board Memberships
Current Memberships
Editor Records (manuscripts handled as editor)
Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

110

Reviews (last 12 months)

29

Reviews (average per year)

24

Merit

330

Openness

0.0%

Acceptance rate

32.1%


Journal Impact factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Matthew T. Sutherland has reviewed for.

Matthew T. Sutherland

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Matthew T. Sutherland's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Matthew T. Sutherland each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review (for which we have content), compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.