Profile
Statistics

Marcos Nieto

Bio

Dr. Marcos Nieto received the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Spain, in 2010. Since then he works as a Researcher on computer vision and machine learning techniques of the Intelligent Transport Systems and Engineering Area of Vicomtech, where is Principal Researcher since 2014. His current research interests include the use of optimization methods for computer vision. He has been technical and scientific coordinator of FP7 and H2020 projects and is author of more than 60 peer reviewed international publications in relevant conferences (41) and journals (19), also being active reviewer of prestigious journals.

Editorial Board Memberships

Marcos is not currently contributing as an editor for any journal or publisher.

Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

45

Reviews (last 12 months)

1

Reviews (average per year)

12

Merit

135

Openness

0.0%

Review to Publication ratio

3.5:1


Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Marcos Nieto has reviewed for.

Marcos Nieto

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Marcos Nieto's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Marcos Nieto each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.