Profile
Statistics

Mohanakrishna Gunda

Bio

Bioenergy generation is the major aim of research that includes simultanesous remediation of wasteeffluents and emissions. Completed Doctorate in Environmental Biotechnology dealing with the Microbial Fuel Cells for Bioelectricity generation and Dark fermentation for Biohydrogen production. Also, worked on microalgal Biodiesel production, Ecological engineered systems, Biomethane production (Anaerobic digestion) and various Environemntal consultancy projects related to Environmental impact assessment, Carrying capacity studies, Design and evaluation of Effluent and Sewage treatment plants (ETP and STPs). At present, actively working on microbial electrosyntheisis of value added chemicals and energy equivalnets from CO2 sequestration through bio-electrochemical process.

Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

184

Reviews (last 12 months)

17

Reviews (average per year)

28

Merit

667

Openness

0.0%


Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Mohanakrishna Gunda has reviewed for.

Mohanakrishna Gunda

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Mohanakrishna Gunda's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Mohanakrishna Gunda each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.