Profile
Statistics

Johannes A. Lenstra

Bio

Hans Lenstra (Utrecht University, Netherlands) has been educated as chemist and biochemist. Since 1978 he has worked on molecular evolution, eukaryotic gene structure, genome characterization and molecular diversity of livestock and wildlife. His present research interests include the molecular diversity of cattle, sheep, goat, water buffalo and horse by analysis of mitochondrial and Y-chromosomal DNA variation, microsatellites, high-density SNP datasets and complete genomic sequencing. He considers the use of genomic data and the development of accessible analysis tools to translate dense datasets to biologically relevant conclusions as the present challenge. Since 2014 he is Editor-in-Chief of Animal Genetics.

Editorial Board Memberships

Johannes is not currently contributing as an editor for any journal or publisher.

Editor Records (manuscripts handled as editor)
Has reviewed for

Showing 6 of 55  

Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

252

Reviews (last 12 months)

13

Reviews (average per year)

17

Merit

762

Openness

1.6%

Review to Publication ratio

1:0.6


Journal Impact factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Johannes A. Lenstra has reviewed for.

Johannes A. Lenstra

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Johannes A. Lenstra's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Johannes A. Lenstra each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review (for which we have content), compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.