Profile
Statistics

Nicholas Badcock

Bio

I completed a combined MPsych/PhD in Applied Developmental Psychology at the University of Western Australia in 2008. Under the supervision of Dr John Hogben and Associate Professor Janet Fletcher, my PhD research focussed on applying the attentional blink in children and dyslexia.

From 2008 to 2011 I worked as a postdoctoral research fellow with Professor Dorothy Bishop in Oxford Study of Children's Communication Impairments (OSCCI) at Oxford University. My work predominantly examined language lateralisation in adults and toddlers using functional Transcanial Doppler Ultrasound.

I returned to Australia in 2011 to take up a postdoctoral research fellowship at Macquarie University. With Associated Professor Genevieve McArthur, I am working on cognitive preparation and its relationship with reading.

Research Fields

Psychology and Cognitive Sciences

Editorial Board Memberships
Current Memberships
Editor Records (manuscripts handled as editor)
Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

83

Reviews (last 12 months)

14

Reviews (average per year)

10

Merit

249

Openness

1.2%


Journal Impact factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Nicholas Badcock has reviewed for.

Nicholas Badcock

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Nicholas Badcock's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Nicholas Badcock each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review (for which we have content), compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.