Thomas Liehr


The lab of molecular cytogenetics at the Institut für Humangenetik in Jena has different research lines, all of them connected by the interest in chromosome structure and evolution. The main research interest is within the frame of clinical genetic research, i.e. the characterization of acquired and inherited chromosomal aberrations with the aim to understand the biological background of how and why such alterations from the normal happen. There are ongoing projects on small supernumerary marker chromosomes (, chromosomal heteromorphisms on chromosomes 2 and 9 and fragile sites. In leukemia-research the lab is involved in the search for cryptic, disease-associated or -causing chromosomal aberrations. Besides we are interested in chromosomal evolution and have cowork with other groups working on fish-species (Brasil), turtle (Italy), or Rhodentia (Russia). Apart from multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization ( approaches like immunohistochemistry, microsatellite analysis ( or array-CGH are applied in the research. For further information see

Research Fields

human genetics

Editor Records (manuscripts handled as editor)
Has reviewed for

Showing 6 of 124  

Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Post Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.



Reviews (last 12 months)


Reviews (average per year)






Review to Publication ratio


Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Thomas Liehr has reviewed for.

Thomas Liehr

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Thomas Liehr's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Thomas Liehr each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.