Elisabeth M. Bik


Elisabeth Bik is a Science Editor at uBiome, a company that develops microbiome sequencing analysis kits for consumers and clinicians. She received her PhD at Utrecht University in The Netherlands and worked at the Dutch National Institute for Health and the St. Antonius Hospital in Nieuwegein. In 2001, she joined Stanford University’s School of Medicine, where she worked on the characterization of the human microbiome in thousands of oral, gastric, and intestinal samples. In addition, she analyzed the microbiota of marine mammals, in particular that of dolphins and sea lions. When she is not in the lab, she can be found working on her blog, an almost daily compilation of scientific papers in the rapidly growing microbiome field, or on Twitter at @MicrobiomDigest. She is also interested in the detection of plagiarism and image duplications and manipulations in the published biomedical literature, and currently peer reviews 30 to 40 manuscripts per year.

Research Fields

Medical Bacteriology

Editorial Board Memberships
Current Memberships
Editor Records (manuscripts handled as editor)
Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.



Reviews (last 12 months)


Reviews (average per year)






Acceptance rate


Review to Publication ratio


Impact factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the impact factors of journals Elisabeth M. Bik has reviewed for.

Elisabeth M. Bik

Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all) reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Elisabeth M. Bik's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Elisabeth M. Bik each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review (for which we have content), compared to the average of Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all) reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all) reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.