Poowin Bunyavejchewin is a researcher at the Institute of East Asian Studies (IEAS) at Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand. His primary research interests include Asia-Pacific security, the politics of regionalism in Southeast Asia and Thai foreign policy. Prior to joining IEAS in December 2013, he was a lecturer at the School of Liberal Arts at Walailak University. Bunyavejchewin holds an MA in International Politics from the University of Hull, UK, and a BA (Hons) in Political Science from Thammasat University. He was awarded Thammasat University’s Outstanding Young Researcher Award in 2014. He was invited as a delegate under the Southeast Asian Young Leaders’ Programme (SEAYLP) to participate in the IISS Shangri-La Dialogue, one of the world’s top security forums, in 2017.
Editorial Board Memberships
Poowin is not currently contributing as an editor for any journal or publisher.
Has reviewed for
Pre Publication Reviews
Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.
Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.
Reviews (last 12 months)
Reviews (average per year)
Review to Publication ratio
Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for
The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Poowin Bunyavejchewin has reviewed for.
All fields reviewers
Total reviews over time
A cumulative record of Poowin Bunyavejchewin's total number of reviews.
Reviews per month
The total number of reviews performed by Poowin Bunyavejchewin each month.
Average review length
The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.
Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.
Weekly review punchcard
The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.