Juan C. Correa


I love to study sensitive topics of everyday life. Especially those that we can tackle with available data and from an Interdisciplinary approach (i.e., using different theoretical and methodological frameworks). I have a wide variety of academic interests including Complexity and Social Complex Systems, Psychology of Corruption, Ideological Consumerism, Consumer Psychology, Analysis of Natural Language in Politics, Urban Mobility, and Urban Traffic. I also enjoy studying new research methods and techniques such as reproducible research, structural equation modeling, Agent-based simulations, Data and Text Mining, Web Scraping (through R or Python), Montecarlo Simulations, and the family of Multiple Regression Models (e.g., Kernel, Linear, Logistic, Probit, Logit). More recently, I am studying networks science to enhance my theoretical and methodological background.

Editorial Board Memberships

Juan is not currently contributing as an editor for any journal or publisher.

Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.



Reviews (last 12 months)


Reviews (average per year)






Review to Publication ratio


Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Juan C. Correa has reviewed for.

Juan C. Correa

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Juan C. Correa's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Juan C. Correa each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review (for which we have content), compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.