Profile
Statistics

Mauricio Kugler

Bio

Mauricio Kugler received his degree in electrical engineering in 2000, and the MSc degree in biomedical engineering in 2003, both from the Federal Technological University of Paraná, Brazil. In 2007, he received a PhD degree in computer science and engineering from the Nagoya Institute of Technology, Japan. Currently, he is an assistant professor at the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at this same institute and an invite professor at the École Supérieure d'Ingénieurs en Génie Électrique (ESIGELEC), France. His research interests include machine learning, pattern recognition, biomedical signal & image processing, neural networks, embedded systems and reconfigurable hardware.

Editorial Board Memberships

Mauricio is not currently contributing as an editor for any journal or publisher.

Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

27

Reviews (last 12 months)

6

Reviews (average per year)

3

Merit

81

Openness

0.0%


Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Mauricio Kugler has reviewed for.

Mauricio Kugler

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Mauricio Kugler's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Mauricio Kugler each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.