Profile
Statistics

Szymon Wasik

Bio

I received the M.Sc. in 2008 and Ph.D. in 2013, both in computer science at Poznan University of Technology (PUT), Poland. I am an assistant professor in Institute of Computing Science at PUT and Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry at Polish Academy of Sciences. Moreover, for over ten years I am a coach of teams participating in programming contests, and I am developing online judge systems supporting such competitions. I was PI on the project which objective was to develop Optil.io platform (a system that supports evaluation of optimization algorithms using an Evaluation as a Service scheme). My main areas of interest are operational research, optimization, bioinformatics and application of crowdsourcing.

Editorial Board Memberships

Szymon is not currently contributing as an editor for any journal or publisher.

Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

27

Reviews (last 12 months)

8

Reviews (average per year)

5

Merit

81

Openness

0.0%


Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Szymon Wasik has reviewed for.

Szymon Wasik

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Szymon Wasik's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Szymon Wasik each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.