Profile
Statistics

Lars Chittka

Bio

Chittka has carried out extensive work on the behaviour, cognition and ecology of bumblebees and honeybees, and their interactions with flowers. He developed perceptual models of animal colour vision, allowing the derivation of optimal receiver systems as well as a quantification of the evolutionary pressures shaping flower signals. Chittka also made fundamental contributions to the understanding of animal cognition and its fitness benefits in the economy of nature. He explored phenomena such as numerosity, speed-accuracy trade-offs, false memories and social learning in bees. His discoveries have made a substantial impact on the understanding of animal intelligence and its neural-computational underpinnings. He has published over 180 peer-reviewed articles.

Editorial Board Memberships

Lars is not currently contributing as an editor for any journal or publisher.

Editor Records (manuscripts handled as editor)
Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

7

Reviews (last 12 months)

1

Reviews (average per year)

7

Merit

21

Openness

0.0%


Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Lars Chittka has reviewed for.

Lars Chittka

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Lars Chittka's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Lars Chittka each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.