Profile
Statistics

Devis Di Tommaso

Bio

Devis studied Chemistry at the Universita' degli Studi di Trieste and graduated summa cum laude in 2002. He carried out his doctoral studies in the Theoretical Chemistry group headed by Professor Piero Decleva and, in 2006, he successfully defended the Ph.D. thesis with a work on the application and development of density functional theory methods for the study of molecular photoionization processes.

In 2006, Devis conducted postdoctoral research at the Royal Institution of Great Britain in the group of Professor Richard Catlow , where his work focused on theoretical catalysis. As part of a Marie-Curie research and training network, in 2007 he moved to University College London in the group of Professor Nora de Leeuw to work on the development and application of computer simulation methods to investigate the nucleation and growth of metal carbonates from solution. In January 2012 he was awarded a Royal Society Industry Fellowship.

Devis joined the School of Biological and Chemical Sciences at Queen Mary University of London in September 2013.

Editorial Board Memberships

Devis is not currently contributing as an editor for any journal or publisher.

Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

18

Reviews (last 12 months)

18

Reviews (average per year)

18

Merit

54

Openness

0.0%


Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Devis Di Tommaso has reviewed for.

Devis Di Tommaso

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Devis Di Tommaso's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Devis Di Tommaso each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review (for which we have content), compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.