Shree Ram Singh


Cancer Biologist with more than 12 years of experience on cancer drug screening, stem cell development, and cancer metabolism using Drosophila stem cell induced tumor model, human cancer cell line, and mouse model system. Published more than 75 peer-reviewed manuscript in reputed Journals including, Nature, Cell Stem Cell, Nature Communications, Developmental Cell, Cell Reports, Oncogene, PLoS Genetics, and Cancer Letters. More than 15 years of experience in writing, editing and publishing high quality scientific papers and book. Established successful research collaborations with diverse groups of scientists. Editorial Board member: Cancer Letters, Scientific Reports, PLOS ONE, PeerJ, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, and BMC Genetics.

Has reviewed for

Showing 6 of 68  

Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.



Reviews (last 12 months)


Reviews (average per year)






Review to Publication ratio


Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Shree Ram Singh has reviewed for.

Shree Ram Singh

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Shree Ram Singh's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Shree Ram Singh each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.