Marco Cempini received the M.Sc. degree in aeronautical engineering (cum laude) both from the University of Pisa, Italy and from Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy in 2010. In 2014 he received the Ph.D. in Robotics at The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy, where he has been a Post-Doctoral fellow. Since September 2015, he is a Post-Doctoral fellow at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. He has been Visiting Student at the Robotics and Mechatronics Laboratory of University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands. His current research interests include efficient and ergonomic mechanical design, modeling and development for wearable robotics, for the development of assistance/rehabilitation robot for upper and lower limbs. Dr. Cempini is member of ASME, IEEE, RAS and EMBS scientific societies. In 2008, he participated the first ESA Lunar Robotics Challenge as a master student. In 2015, he won the KUKA Innovation Award.
Editorial Board Memberships
Marco is not currently contributing as an editor for any journal or publisher.
Has reviewed for
Showing 6 of 24
Pre Publication Reviews
Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.
Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.
Reviews (last 12 months)
Reviews (average per year)
Review to Publication ratio
Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for
The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Marco Cempini has reviewed for.
All fields reviewers
Total reviews over time
A cumulative record of Marco Cempini's total number of reviews.
Reviews per month
The total number of reviews performed by Marco Cempini each month.
Average review length
The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.
Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.
Weekly review punchcard
The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.