Profile
Statistics

Georg Florian Zellmer

Bio

Georg F. Zellmer received his PhD from the Open University, UK, in 1999, and subsequently worked as research fellow at the University of Bristol, the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, the University of Hawaii at Manoa, and Academia Sinica (Taipei). In 2013 he was appointed to Massey University, New Zealand, where he is currently employed as Professor in Earth and Planetary Sciences. Georg's interests include volcanology, igneous petrology, and high-temperature geochemistry, with an emphasis on geochemical techniques to decipher magmatic evolution in a range of tectonic settings. His work focuses on timescales of petrogenetic processes and their links to volcanic eruptions, magmatic hygrometry, volatile cycling through subduction zones, and integrating geophysical and geochemical observations at global destructive plate margins.

Pre Publication Reviews

Showing of  

Your statistics are calculated based on the information you have submitted to Publons.
Read more about them here.

Compare your statistics to those of any research field on Publons using the form below. Leaving the form blank will compare your statistics to all research fields on Publons.


Reviews

102

Reviews (last 12 months)

2

Reviews (average per year)

6

Merit

379

Openness

41.2%

Review to Publication ratio

2.4:1


Journal Impact Factors of journals reviewed for

The distribution of the Journal Impact Factors of journals Georg Florian Zellmer has reviewed for.

Georg Florian Zellmer

All fields reviewers

Total reviews over time

A cumulative record of Georg Florian Zellmer's total number of reviews.

Reviews per month

The total number of reviews performed by Georg Florian Zellmer each month.

Average review length

The average number of words per review compared to the average of All fields reviewers and the average of reviewers at affiliated institutions.

Note: only reviews with associated content are included in the graph below and where content is present we can not guarantee that it is complete or truly the content of the review.

Weekly review punchcard

The distribution of days that reviews were performed on, compared to All fields reviewers and reviewers at affiliated institutions.